Okay here goes:
We all know that each classes are equally lethal and useful. Numerous debates and comparisons have been made to prove that they're all equally important and balanced. Yet, a while ago people often discounted one class or another as being useless (some still do). Part of the reason why this may be is that while they were playing the PvE portion, they ran up against mobs or a certain class that were either lethally impressive or laughably useless to the point where we immediately say 'So-and-so was pathetic against me. All people of that class must thus be also useless.'
So this is what I'm trying to find out. Do you feel that certain classes are poorly represented by mobs in PvE? For instance, you were playing about and all the necros were casting skills that could be potentially useful but never following up with the killer combo (or not having other classes to carry out that combo). Therefore, you never perceived them as a notable threat. Or was it silly elementalists that kept spamming spells despite you countering them easily each time? Well, voice your opinions.
Just bear in mind that although people might feel that griffons may be blindly stupid for not countering enchantments, pure-warriors do not have that option either. Don't hold it against them for not grouping up with other classes. However, if you feel that they COULD have used another Warrior skill to amplify their effectiveness, then by all means choose them as the poorest form of representation for warriors.
My money's on Necros though. The only necro mobs that I don't regard as a minor annoyance are the SF necros and probably Lord Timot. The others just don't have that good skills with them to pose much of a threat (although I could be forgetting a few).