GWOnline.Net News
PC Gaming News
Page 10 of 18 FirstFirst ... 67891011121314 ... LastLast
Results 91 to 100 of 180
  1. #91
    GWOnline.Net Member Achievements:
    10 PostsVeteran1,000 Posts5000 Experience Points6 months registered
    Ora's Avatar
    Posts

    3,852
    Thumbs Up:
    Received: 19

    0 Not allowed!
    Quote Originally Posted by Lord Melvin
    Actually the Juggernauts would kill the Siege Turtles and then you would have to kill everything yourself anyway.

    And by the way, there's another thread on this over in the Ritualist forum.
    Hmm, I think there is a way around that, since the siege turtle attacks don't do collateral damage
    Let's wait and see untill the game is released.

  2. #92
    GWOnline.Net Member Rekit's Avatar
    Posts

    266
    Thumbs Up:
    Received: 0

    0 Not allowed!

    Talking

    Quote Originally Posted by Mraezk
    Dwarf A: "Oh my God! That warrior stole one of our gears! Get him!"
    Dwarf B: "Yessir, I'll just go cleave the monk in two first, then w-"
    Dwarf A: "What?! Can't you see? That WARRIOR has our GEAR! Get HIM!"
    Dwarf B: "But Sir, the monk in the back there doing cartwheels, right next to the naked dancing Elementalist, sh-"
    Dwarf A: "Do you see the monk holding a gear? Hmm?"
    Dwarf B: "Well, no..."
    Dwarf A: "And who, may I ask, is holding a gear?"
    Dwarf B: "...the warrior."
    Dwarf A: "Now, need I remind you of the historical and cultural significance of our beloved Gears, again?"
    Dwarf C: "Oh, hell."
    Dwarf B: "No Sir! We'll attack the heavily armored guy with the magical protections surging around him, and damned be the rest! Sir!"
    *absolute, gut-busting, near-hysterical laughter!!*

    Grenth curse you, Mraezk! The monitor wiped off easily enough, but the keyboard didn't survive the sudden Pepsi-tsunami!

    heheh thanks for making my day, hilarious! (I was in need of new keys anyways :P )

    Quote Originally Posted by Cérilia
    Thank you Mraezk for this answer to the point of Rekit... Couldn't have said better!
    awww come on it's not such a stretch, those quirky folks they keep behind closed doors at Anet have shown before an off-beat sense of humor we all enjoy, Rodgort/Trogdor, the Ogre Slaying Knife, etc etc

    (which, on a completely off-topic note, I found a wep in Cantha this past weekend that had a "dmg +10% vs. Ogres" mod on it, could make that Knife the 'leet' Green to have :P )
    Last edited by Rekit; 29-03-2006 at 19:55. Reason: Cérilia's picking on me! :P

  3. #93
    GWOnline.Net Member
    Posts

    1,153
    Thumbs Up:
    Received: 0

    0 Not allowed!
    http://forums.gwonline.net/showthread.php?t=383267

    Just a small reminder for the ones that don't read the ritualist forums.

    (It's NOT the link to the other discusion about this.)

  4. #94
    GWOnline.Net Member ccrazool's Avatar
    Posts

    3,682
    Thumbs Up:
    Received: 0

    0 Not allowed!
    Quote Originally Posted by Gangrel
    http://forums.gwonline.net/showthread.php?t=383267

    Just a small reminder for the ones that don't read the ritualist forums.

    (It's NOT the link to the other discusion about this.)
    (Conjecture in January) < (real life test results by hundreds of gamers last weekend) The "Urn Effect" is real, and requires immediate attention.

    Do the right thing, ANet! Give me 60 plat! Er, I mean, Do the right thing, ANet! Fix the "Urn Effect"!

  5. #95
    GWOnline.Net Member
    Posts

    120
    Thumbs Up:
    Received: 0

    0 Not allowed!
    AAAANNeeeeeeeet, hellloooooooo!!

    Cantha is in ashes, it's burning, fiiiix it!

  6. #96
    GWOnline.Net Member Oxana's Avatar
    Posts

    212
    Thumbs Up:
    Received: 0

    0 Not allowed!
    Hello.

    I know about the book trick. Why does ANet create spells that do not work for ritualists.

    You get attacked immediately.

    The best way to use them is to exploit the AI. This is not okay.

  7. #97
    GWOnline.Net Member Brainbasher's Avatar
    Posts

    339
    Thumbs Up:
    Received: 0

    0 Not allowed!
    The best way to use them is to exploit the AI. This is not okay.
    truer words have not been spoken yet.

  8. #98
    GWOnline.Net Member Garreth MacLeod's Avatar
    Posts

    3,231
    Thumbs Up:
    Received: 0

    0 Not allowed!
    Just my $.02.

    The issue with the Ritualist skills will need to be fixed, unless there is some reason they are considered more detrimental to the "mob" than anything else going on.

    In regards to the other various "tricks", a lot of people are calling them exploits. Having played this game since release and seeing what ArenaNet does when people take advantage of exploits, I think it's fairly clear the ArenaNet doesn't consider those "tricks" to be exploits. Not sure what they consider them though. Alternative solutions maybe? I don't expect them to be done away with and some of the explanations I've seen given in this thread do make some of them seem more plausible.

  9. #99
    GWOnline.Net Member
    Posts

    3,888
    Thumbs Up:
    Received: 0

    0 Not allowed!
    Quote Originally Posted by Garreth MacLeod
    The issue with the Ritualist skills will need to be fixed, unless there is some reason they are considered more detrimental to the "mob" than anything else going on.
    I'd remove that unless.

    The AI in GW has been demonstrated to have absolutely no judgement. That includes when there is no keg present, you can still manipulate and abuse them. (And the AoE run change made it even easier than it used to be)

    The best thing ArenaNet could do right now is remove any way for players to control who the enemies attack. (And possibly add random targetting in, if they actually want a "challenge". That's the easiest way they have available to do it) Short of that, they'd need to overhaul their entire enemy AI so that it becomes less abusable. Any time you can predict exactly what something will do, you can beat it every time (If it's possible for you to do so :P)

  10. #100
    GWOnline.Net Member Findariel's Avatar
    Posts

    4,815
    Thumbs Up:
    Received: 0

    0 Not allowed!
    Quote Originally Posted by salaboB
    I'd remove that unless.

    The AI in GW has been demonstrated to have absolutely no judgement. That includes when there is no keg present, you can still manipulate and abuse them. (And the AoE run change made it even easier than it used to be)

    The best thing ArenaNet could do right now is remove any way for players to control who the enemies attack. (And possibly add random targetting in, if they actually want a "challenge". That's the easiest way they have available to do it) Short of that, they'd need to overhaul their entire enemy AI so that it becomes less abusable. Any time you can predict exactly what something will do, you can beat it every time (If it's possible for you to do so :P)
    Yes it's true that monsters can be rather easily manipulated but then again, I'm not against some form of manipulation - most mobs aren't that smart! And well .. if it were possible to let ettins behave less intelligent then summit I'd wholeheartedly agree!

    But the stupidity of monsters while you hold a torch or gear, like they're some kind of blinding, dazing, stupefying, hypnotical thing is really the ultimate example of the ultimate silly AI behaviour.

    So yes, away with it - unless the AI can make a difference between a gear and a Scepter of Orr ...!!

Posting Permissions

Posting Permissions

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off