what is going on?
come here to vent ur disbelief.
PC Gaming News
Results 1 to 10 of 24
Thread: Hero armor vs Player Armor
02-09-2007, 16:31 #1
Hero armor vs Player Armor
02-09-2007, 16:32 #2
02-09-2007, 16:34 #3
02-09-2007, 16:35 #4
I assume you are talking about the quality of the hero armor (upgraded) vs the lack of quality on the players'?
If so, from what I have seen posted on wiki; I agree as the hero ones are wonderful looking; but the players' are pretty bland re-skins... especially the monk ones.
02-09-2007, 16:35 #5
my opinion: Hero armor looks much better than player armor and it seems more work was put into it. Player's armor are generally a pile of recycled turd. ^^
02-09-2007, 16:39 #6
its really baffling how absurdly crap some of the player armors are.
one of the rits armor is a reskin of 1k armor - see here;
seitung 1k - http://gw.gamewikis.org/wiki/Image:R...gray_front.jpg
aaaaaaaaand 10k asuran armor -
very uninspired. i dont own a rit - but id be pretty sad if i saw that XD
02-09-2007, 16:41 #7
maybe they let the noob programmers program the armors -
or maybe they let their kids do it....
or maybe they had the same epiphany twice....."ooh - i know THIS could be a good armor"
02-09-2007, 16:44 #8
Unless you're refering to the fact that both have a headwrap, a short-sleve top, a girly skirt, and boots, then yes... all ritualist armor is similar.
You have to really stretch it to claim they're exact "reskins". The similarities are so minor and trivial, I can't understand why you folks are bickering.This barren soil
scorched and stained
by the blood of soldiers
left fallen in the rain
All the light in the world today
Won't light up the night
into which I walk away
02-09-2007, 16:47 #9
02-09-2007, 16:49 #10
What's the big deal, they are SIMILAR, one has bones, the other does not. Why ***** about it? If you don't like it, then don't buy it.