Asura redesign - let's guess!

[D E A T H L I F E]

Well I guess there is no redesign...and after looking at the demo they don't look THAT bad...but what's with their movements? Seems they're drunk all the time.

[Rushster]

They said they wanted to keep them quirky and make their movement feel like they were small but a the same time powerful. In other words if they are carrying an oversized weapon for their size, their movement and weapon carry actions would reflect that.

[Erasmus]

I like their animations and they're appropriate for top heavy bipedal sacks of potatoes.

[shawn]

Well there wasn't a redesign as with the sylvari, but there certainly were options to make a gw1-ish asura rather than the babyfaced creepy asura that had been shown off up till now.

That's good enough for me.

[Rob Van Der Sloot]

the re-design from GW1 to GW2 doesn't bother me at all though, since I will not be making one.

So... doesn't that mean that it DOES bother you?

[CHIPS]

In my opinion the GW2 Asura look too much like WoW gnomes. Small humanoids with big, bright eyes. Me not likey.

Don't worry. You will see their golem, not them, 99% of the time anyways.

I hope they release more info on Asura specialties. Right now it seems the only reason to play Asura is for the golems.

[Alaris]

Actually, my main reason to play an asura is their small size and bunny ears. Golems is a big bonus though, and I still hope for lazers. And tazers.

[Uriah_Heep]

Asura looks and animations are very unique. That's a good reason to make an Asura. My first char will be an Asura for sure.

[sorudo]

i would "try" an asura engineer and call him igor