| Thumbs Up: |
| Received: 6 |
I know. I'm just saying from an "in-game" perspective, a norn and charr could 1v1 each other, but in "reality", that wouldn't be the case...Originally Posted by Alaris
| Thumbs Up: |
| Received: 186 |
Lore-wise, I'm not sure who'd win a fight, a charr or a norn... It seems pretty obvious though that the other 3 races would be in trouble, aside for asuras maybe if they get to bring some of their golems.
== Alaris & clone ==
Proud Officer of The Order Of Dii [Dii] - join us
You can tell the quality of life of people by what they complain about
| Thumbs Up: |
| Received: 6 |
See that's the problem--didn't the lore say somewhere the norn totally owned the charr? Also, didn't Ascalon City not fall for like, 25 years after the searing or something nutty like that? I think the charr are probably overestimated in terms of strength. I don't know, though. Not that this is particularly on topic, or anything.
| Thumbs Up: |
| Received: 186 |
Well, I was talking 1vs1, big-scale fights are different because then it really matters how many you are in the army, and what your combat tech is. Ascalon had big walls, charr were pretty low-tech back then.
The lore on charr vs norn 1vs1, afaik, is divided. It says conflicting things.
Proud Officer of The Order Of Dii [Dii] - join us
You can tell the quality of life of people by what they complain about
Reply With Quote
